2/14/2024 0 Comments Soundsource headphone eq![]() Some of the fluctuating parts in the upper range might not feel like much subjectively, and might not be what a graph shows them to be. Most people would probably wish to lift part of the treble, but I usually don't take any risk with high frequencies and at the very least I do not rely on measurements for tuning high freqs.ĮQing the U12 might be trickier. So trying to find what's just right for me is usually beneficial to my overall enjoyment.Īnd really that's it because the original FR seems clean. Then I would probably fool around 4kHz in a really narrow band because it's one of those frequencies where a little too much kills me but too little kills the energy of the track. I like bass rumble but I don't like extra energy above 100Hz, so based on online measurements and assuming I'm able to get a nice seal, I would probably attenuate a fairly large area centered around 150Hz or a little lower by. I just happen to know myself a little when it comes to FR as I've been fooling with EQ and IEMs for a LONG time): I cannot talk about you and your ears, but I can talk about what I would probably prefer(which is subjective and not in a any way something you must prefer. Aria seems easier to EQ with its smooth response so you probably should fool around more with that one for now. But I'd be even less surprised to learn that there is still one response you like more. It's like giving paint and a brush to someone, sometimes you'll love it, sometimes you would have preferred no work done at all.īoth IEMs have a fairly typical response(different but typical), and I wouldn't be surprised if you happened to enjoy your music using both as they are. Don't get me wrong, if you don't know where you're going, for some FR that will be more pleasing to you, there is also a vast array of FRs that would make the IEMs subjectively worst for you. Just with that I'm very tempted to question what "custom-tailored" actually means in this case. It's so very unlikely that both are your preferred signature, as they are already noticeably different. Anything is possible but just by mentioning 2 different IEMs you think you prefer without EQ, It seems like there is a problem. The headphone might need a complete re-tuning or maybe it only needs a subtle change in one place to get your favorite response. That alone justifies EQ.Ĭan a headphone/IEM already fit your preference? Of course that's possible, but it's statistically way more likely that there is another response you'd like more. It's well accepted that the frequency response is a major criterion in establishing a listener's preference. That kind of random flailing about is what fuels the headphone market. They just buy another random set of headphones that are off in a different direction. ![]() ![]() Not everyone is willing to put that into finding an optimal sound. That takes some work and careful concentration. You just have to get an equalizer that is as adjustable a possible, and take an organized approach to equalizing to achieve your personal target curve. I luckily stumbled upon some headphones that are with a couple of dB of my ideal curve. But that is going to be a trial and error affair. It is possible to get by without EQ if you sample a LOT of headphones and buy a set that sound right out of the box. Ones designed for specific makes and models of cans are a little bit better, but that doesn't take into account your personal tastes in response curves. If you can't adjust bands individually, it's not worth EQing, because you'll never be satisfied. I've always found that EQ presets, especially the ones named after genres of music, are useless. It's going to vary from one set of headphones to another, and will also depend on your particular taste. There's no one size fits all setting for EQ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |